We often hear the saying, “Opposite’s attract”. It’s a familiar concept, one that seems to make sense—at least when we look at natural phenomena. Consider magnets: like poles repel, but opposite poles attract. The same holds true for electricity: when there’s a voltage difference, current flows. Curious? Simply touch a live electrical wire while your feet are grounded, and you’ll experience this truth firsthand. Your body, a good conductor, will allow the current to pass through with striking immediacy.
But does this mean that in relationships, opposites should always attract? Should we avoid seeking common ground, convinced that difference is what makes us whole?
It’s an intriguing thought, but one that requires deeper examination.
The Pull of the Opposite
In the realm of relationships, many are drawn to qualities that are diametrically opposed to their own. If you’re an introvert, you may find yourself enchanted by an extroverted, outgoing partner, someone who seems to live effortlessly in the spotlight. You marvel at how they navigate social situations with ease, while you shy away from the limelight. In this, there is a sense of “completeness” that emerges—a filling of the gaps you perceive in yourself.
Another metaphor I often use involves shoes. If your shoes are worn and dirty, you may find yourself noticing others who seem to have it all together—shoes polished, perfect, pristine. They’re the ones who seem to have their lives in order, and there’s a subtle admiration that grows.
But here, we encounter two divergent ideas that shape the fabric of human connection: the idea of completeness versus the idea of individualism.
Let’s explore both.
The Believers: Seeking Completion
The first group—let’s call them the “Believers”—are often drawn to people who offer what they lack. They feel an inherent desire for another person to fill the spaces within them, to create a partnership where two incomplete beings become whole through their union. For these individuals, relationships are grounded in a mutual journey through life, facing challenges together, validating each other’s existence.
This kind of connection isn’t always about exploration or self-growth. Rather, it’s about companionship—two people coming together, forging a life, and building a sense of shared purpose. Outside of the romantic sphere, these individuals often thrive in communities, finding strength in numbers and working together to solve collective problems.
Thus, in relationships, these “Believers” seek partners who complement them, balancing out what they feel they lack. They are driven by a sense of mutual dependence, a bond forged in shared experience, and an unspoken promise to face life’s struggles hand in hand.
The Seekers: Embracing Individualism
On the other side, we have the “Seekers”—those who are committed to personal exploration and self-actualization. These individuals value their independence and don’t rely on a partner to complete them. They are already whole, content in their own journey, and often prefer to walk through life as individuals.
This doesn’t mean that they’re not open to love, but rather that they seek someone who shares their spirit of growth, discovery, and adventure. For them, relationships are about companionship and shared exploration, not about filling voids or fixing weaknesses.
Consider this: If I’m reading a book on psychology, and you’re reading one on philosophy, we may seem to be on separate journeys. But when we come together to read a fictional book, we share something profound—a deeper, richer exploration of a single work of fiction, applying our different lenses to its characters. Even after finishing the book, we continue to engage in thoughtful dialogue, exploring every nuance and depth.
In this way, Seekers don’t just exist beside one another; they grow and evolve together, not by completing each other, but by adding to each other’s understanding of the world. They don’t need a partner to make them whole—they seek someone who understands the value of individuality and is equally invested in their own personal development.
The Path to Depth
And so, the tension between these two ways of being—the Believers and the Seekers—often leads to the question: Can opposites really attract, or do we need something deeper, something more substantial to build lasting love?
The answer lies in the depth.
In early years, the idea of opposites attracting might seem romantic, even alluring. An introvert might be drawn to an extrovert’s energy, or a homebody to the thrill of a partner’s adventures. But as we mature and understand ourselves more deeply, we come to realize that true connection goes beyond mere attraction. Over time, you may find yourself longing not for someone who fills a gap, but for someone who resonates with the depths of your being—someone who shares a core understanding of life and existence, even if they differ in other ways.
As we journey into deeper waters, we confront the excruciating process of self-discovery. We shed layers, discard old versions of ourselves, and slowly uncover the truths that define us. These truths, these essential parts of who we are, are the qualities we should look for in others. In this way, we explore not only our own depths but also the depths of another.
When we find someone who shares a similar core, a shared understanding of self and world; the relationship becomes a dialogue, not just a monologue. It becomes a space where both partners can speak, listen, and grow. Without this shared ground, there’s little room for meaningful exchange. It’s like trying to have a conversation with someone who speaks a different language—without common understanding, communication falters.
The Magnetism of Common Ground
This is why relationships that are built on a shared core—a common ground of values, principles, or beliefs—are often the most enduring. As with magnets, opposites can certainly attract, but they must eventually find balance. A magnet needs both north and south poles to function, but it is the core essence of the magnet itself that defines its strength.
In relationships, too, the core identity of each person must remain intact. The relationship itself must be grounded in mutual understanding and respect for each individual’s essence. Only then can both partners begin to explore the opposites—different perspectives, varying interests, opposing viewpoints—which serve to deepen and strengthen the connection.
Conclusion: Going Vertical and then expanding Horizontal
I like to think of this process as going vertical in a relationship first—establishing a solid foundation on common values and core beliefs. From there, the relationship can expand horizontally, exploring all the diverse experiences, opinions, and adventures that each partner brings to the table. But this only works if both individuals are clear about who they are—secure in their identities—so that they can explore the unknown together while remaining rooted in their essence.
In the end, whether we are Seekers or Believers, the relationship that truly thrives is one that honors the depth of both individuals. It’s a relationship that goes beyond surface attraction, one that fosters growth, exploration, and the beauty of shared journeys. And in this way, opposites can attract—but only when they are grounded in a deeper connection that transcends difference and seeks understanding.